Functional Food Patents - Manufacturers Starting to Rely on Patented Technologies For Protection

The United States functional foods market isHealth claims are limited to statements of a
relatively immature compared to that ofreduction in the risk of a disease and cannot claim
nutraceuticals. From an intellectual propertythat the product is a treatment for it, lest it be
standpoint, this may be because functional foodconsidered a drug. However, the distinction
technology develops from within the foodbecomes blurred as the physiological benefits of
industry, while nutraceuticals may come as thevarious botanical substances are determined.
result of convergence between the food industryQualified health claims must contain a statement
and industries with greater IP acumen.such as this: "Although the evidence is not
Historically, food technology is not an area ofconclusive, eating [a specific substance] may
frequent patenting relative to other technologiesreduce the risk of [a specific disease]." In
such as formulation science that impacts thestructure/function claims, the wording of the claim
nutraceutical and functional food markets. Whileis important in determining whether the substance
patenting of food technologies has risen in recentis considered a food or a dietary supplement as
years, most of the filings are classified more likeopposed to a drug. The claim must discuss the
medicines and usually cover processes such aseffect of the substance on a structure or
extraction or purification rather than bare endfunction of the body rather than claiming a benefit
product-and that results in the FDA treating thewith respect to a disease.
products as drugs. Interestingly, the FDALegal Requirements
regulates nutraceuticals less stringently than foodsLegally, health claims must meet the Significant
in terms of what health claims can be made.Scientific Agreement (SSA) standard, which
Functional foods impart health benefits above andimposes a burden of showing to the FDA's
beyond those naturally found in foods. Thesatisfaction that the claims are supported by
functionality comes from adding ingredients suchpublished studies and opinions from qualified
as antioxidants and cholesterol-reducingprofessionals. Exceptions are made for a few
ingredients, or from the elimination of undesirablequalified health claims or for claims based on an
components such as sodium or saturated fat.authoritative statement by a U.S. scientific body
Substances that the FDA classifies generallyas defined by Congress.
recognized as safe (GRAS) are highly utilizedHowever, most health claims necessary to
because they do not require separate FDAdistinguish functional foods from their counterparts
approval.on the grocery store shelves require the
Marketing Health Benefitsmanufacturer to generate supportive data.
From a regulatory standpoint, the only way toMoreover, manufacturers are required to
market the benefits of a product to consumers isgenerate supportive data without having the
by using the product label to promote thosestudies deemed clinical trials, which would thrust its
benefits, which is more difficult with functionalfunctional food into classification as a drug and
foods than nutraceuticals. Thus, while patentedrequire the costly submission of a New Drug
technologies may be employed to createApplication for market approval. This can create a
improved functional foods, their makers may bedifficult dilemma for getting functional foods to the
unable to create the level of consumer benefitmarket.
awareness required for successful marketing.The Lines Are Blurring
Moreover, many U.S. consumers would ratherAs we become more knowledgeable about the
supplement their diets with nutraceuticals thanmechanisms of action of botanical substances and
change the way they eat. That is, they'd ratherexploit their properties by using them in functional
swallow a pill than eat and drink their way tofoods or supplements, the division between food
health.ingredients and drugs is increasingly blurred. Food
The FDA position on food labeling is that foodcrops have always been bred for more desirable
content or health claims must be supported bytraits. Now genetic modification is improving this
data, and the results of randomized, double-blindprocess, producing foods with increased nutritional
clinical studies are the best supporting data.value.
However, the FDA may consider a substance aMoreover, ingredient extraction technologies have
drug if it has been the subject of published clinicalenabled product manufacturers to add functional
trials. In fact, the FDA will block foods containingingredients from one food into another. In the
approved drugs or biologics from the foodevent that a producer is successful at
market. Thus, while tests must be conducted todeveloping-and preferably patenting-sound
support health claims, if those tests are in clinicalfunctional food technology, the ultimate challenge
trials, they may cause the ingredients to beremains to sell enough of the product to make it
categorized as drugs and subject to moreprofitable.
onerous safety regulations.One may intuit that with patents granted and
The Four Food Label Claimshealth claims approved for labeling, functional
The FDA defines the four basic classifications offoods should succeed if the prices are reasonable.
food label claims as nutrient content, health,Not quite. Although ingredients may be available in
qualified health, and structure/function claims.functional foods at only a modest cost increase,
Nutrient content claims may describe reductionsmany people may rather get them from a
or increases of quantities of specific substancescapsule than pay extra for functional food
from the list of allowed substances, or compare aproducts, even if the end cost of using functional
product to a reference food. Health claims arefoods in lieu of nutraceuticals is less. As illogical as
statements that characterize the relationshipthat may sound, it may be true. Thus, even with
between a substance and a reduction in the riskpatent and health claims intact, consumers may
of a health condition or disease, and can bebe more difficult to convince than the patent
expressed or implied by the product branding oroffice or the FDA.
packaging.