Our Children May Be the First Generation That Will Not Outlive Their Parents

Family meals,adequate sleep and limited TV timeroutines. Each one appears to be associated with
may lower childhood obesity.a lower rate of obesity in these pre school
A new national study suggests that prechildren, and it seems that having more than one
school-aged children are likely to have a lower riskof these routines appears to lower the risk.
for obesity if they regularly engage in one orThe research suggests that an approach to
more of three specific household routines: eatingobesity prevention that emphasizes these routines
dinner as a family, getting adequate sleep andmight be acceptable to parents and pediatricians
limiting their weekday television viewing time.because adopting these practices could enhance
In a large sample study of the U.S. population, thechild well-being without a need to focus entirely on
study showed that four year olds living in homesweight.
with all three routines had an almost forty perIt is recognized, it may be more difficult for some
cent lower prevalence of obesity than did childrenfamilies than others to have regular meals
living in homes that practiced none of thesetogether, to ensure the child gets enough sleep,
routines.and to limit the child's television time. However,
It is suggested that households practicing none ofgiven their specific circumstances and constraints,
these routines, adopting just one could lower afamilies with young children may want to consider
child's risk of becoming obese, and having two orwhat it would take for them to have these
three of the routines was more proactive thanroutines for their child. I feel we should support
one.parents in their efforts to establish and maintain
I imagine people are going to want to know whichthese household routines,
one of the routines is the most important. Is itThis is a huge problem and I am thankful the
the limiting of television, is it a family dinner, or isFederal Government is finally getting
it adequate sleep? And what I have readinvolved--thank you, thank you!!
suggests that you can't point to any one of these